The Fluidity of Stillness: Understanding Stagnation Amidst Movement
“Movement in Stagnation” captures the tension between seemingly opposite states—feeling spiritually stuck or stagnant while simultaneously experiencing inner changes or shifts. This suggests that even within periods of seeming inertia, movement is happening, whether you recognize it or not.
The experience of feeling both movement and stagnation simultaneously—or alternately—can be influenced by various factors, including your emotional state, external circumstances, and perspective. On a day-to-day basis, there are changes, interactions, and new experiences, which might seem like movement. However, these might not register on the long-term scale, where overarching goals and life trajectories are considered.
ertain philosophies and spiritual perspectives propose that time is not linear but cyclical. Thus, the repetition or perceived stagnation may actually be a part of natural cycles. However, Emotions are incredibly transient; they can change from moment to moment. This emotional flux might be what you’re identifying as “movement” within the stagnation. Emotional highs feel even higher when coming out of a low and vice versa. This contrast might contribute to the sensation of significant movement even when your situation hasn’t drastically changed.
Humans are wired to identify patterns. When you start noticing recurring themes or experiences, your brain flags these as patterns, which can feel like you’re stuck in a loop. Once you recognize a pattern or feel stuck, you’re more likely to notice information that confirms this belief, thereby reinforcing the feeling of being stuck.
Some spiritual teachings suggest that life inherently consists of repetitive cycles—birth, growth, decay, death, and rebirth—and that recognizing this can free you from the illusion of stagnation. Certain philosophies like Buddhism focus on the present moment as the only “real” moment, suggesting that both the past (stagnation) and the future (movement) are constructs of the mind.
When you look at your life on a daily basis, you can see a lot of activities, interactions, and events that unfold. The sun rises and sets, you go to work, eat, sleep, talk to people, perhaps engage in some hobbies. This flurry of activity can give you the impression that things are constantly moving and changing. However, if you were to zoom out and look at a larger slice of your life, say a year or a decade, the feeling is often quite different. Major life circumstances—your job, where you live, your relationship status—may not change as frequently. Even if they do, the underlying patterns of behavior, the kinds of relationships you engage in, and your day-to-day experiences might not undergo a significant transformation. This is where the feeling of “stagnation” often comes in. Despite the constant activity and interactions, there may be an underlying sense that nothing much has really changed—or is going to change.
Emotions, by their very nature, are transient and fluid. Even within a single day, you might experience a range of emotions—joy, frustration, excitement, boredom, love, irritation—and these emotions have a way of coloring your perception. When you’re joyful, the world seems vibrant, full of possibilities; you feel like you’re “moving.” When you’re frustrated or bored, the world can seem dull, repetitive; hence the feeling of “stagnation.”
The mind has certain tendencies that influence this dual experience of movement and stillness. One of these is the brain’s knack for pattern recognition. We make sense of the world by recognizing patterns; it’s how we learn and navigate complex realities. However, this strength can turn into a trap when the patterns you recognize lead to a sense of helplessness or stagnation. For instance, if you’ve had several failed relationships, you may start to believe that all relationships are doomed to fail, leading to a feeling of being “stuck.”
Finally from a more spiritual or existential standpoint, the very idea of movement and stagnation can be questioned. Certain spiritual teachings suggest that the material world is an illusion, and that true “movement” is a journey inward, toward understanding one’s own nature and the nature of reality. In this context, both the feeling of “moving” and “being stuck” can be seen as distractions from the true journey, which is neither about moving nor staying but about understanding and being.
Understanding Confidence: Beyond the Binary of “more” or “less“
It’s a term thrown around often, in self-help books, motivational speeches, and even casual conversations. But what exactly is confidence? Is it an intangible force that some people possess while others lack, or is it an inherent aspect of every individual that remains unaffected by external circumstances? Let’s dive deep into this paradoxical phenomenon.
If one looks closely, the term has been constructed based on societal norms and standards. It is believed that certain behaviors, decisions, or characteristics project a sense of certainty, while others indicate a lack of the same. Over time, these beliefs have formed the structure we identify as confidence. However, considering the vast spectrum of human emotions and the varied circumstances everyone faces, is it valid to classify them under the binary of confidence and its lack?
For instance, a deer running from a predator is often acting out of fear. However, the very act of running, the determination to escape, indicates a level of confidence in its ability to survive. Similarly, when a person is fearful, that fear doesn’t necessarily negate their confidence. The act of acknowledging fear and responding to it can be viewed as an act performed with complete confidence in that particular emotion.
While it’s argued that confidence is unaffected by external situations, one can’t deny the impact of external validation on perceived self-worth. A student praised continuously may seem more confident than one who’s always criticized. But this brings forth another question: Is the confidence of the praised student genuine, or is it a facade built upon external validation? The underlying belief here is that true confidence remains unaffected by external factors. It is an internal compass, guiding one through life’s challenges. The student who seems less confident due to criticism might very well have an inherent belief in their abilities but chooses not to display it openly.
The intricate relationship between fear and confidence is captivating. While at first glance, they might seem opposing, a deeper introspection suggests they coexist harmoniously. As mentioned before, acknowledging fear can be an act of confidence in itself. Embracing one’s vulnerabilities, doubts, and fears can be seen as the highest form of confidence because it stems from self-awareness.
If we view confidence as neither a trait one can gain nor lose but as a constant presence, it reshapes our understanding. In this perspective, every act, regardless of its nature, is executed with full confidence. A person displaying apprehension is confidently apprehensive. A person in doubt is confidently doubtful. Modern society often categorizes confidence in degrees – more or less, high or low. This categorization restricts our understanding. When we say someone is “more confident,” we’re comparing their current state to a previous one or juxtaposing them against someone else. However, by acknowledging that every act is executed with complete alignment to a particular emotion or state of being, the need for comparison dissipates.
Confidence, in its true essence, is not about loud declarations or silent sufferings. It’s about recognizing and accepting the inherent completeness in every emotion, decision, and action. It’s about understanding that every response to a situation, be it with enthusiasm, fear, doubt, or joy, is done with utmost confidence in that response. If confidence is inherent, it would imply that any action performed in a state of fear, joy, or doubt is done with a level of assurance. In a crisis, for example, a hesitant decision to call for help is executed with as much confidence as a swift decision to solve the problem. This inherent nature of confidence, therefore, suggests that the concept is not binary but rather a spectrum, or perhaps beyond a spectrum—a state of consistent existence.
When we look at external circumstances affecting confidence, it becomes apparent that this so-called “influence” is transient. If confidence is genuinely inherent, then external factors may create an illusion of change but cannot alter its core. That said, constant external validation can create a clouded perception of self-worth, often mistaken for genuine self-confidence. The distinction between inherent confidence and externally-induced confidence is crucial for holistic understanding. If confidence is a constant presence, the degrees of “more” or “less” cease to have real meaning. It suggests that everyone, at any point in time, is fully committed to their actions or reactions, be it hesitancy or decisiveness. In such a framework, everyone is performing at their own level of 100% confidence tailored to the specific situation or emotion they are dealing with. Therefore, to say that one is ‘lacking’ in confidence is to misunderstand its inherent nature.
If every act is performed in complete alignment with the emotion or thought process governing it, it removes the need for comparison or valuation, which are tools the ego uses to identify itself. The notion of someone being “more confident” than someone else arises from a place of duality, from distinguishing the self from the ‘other.’ When one’s existence is in complete harmony with the intrinsic nature of confidence, these comparisons become irrelevant.
Love and Longing – A paradox ??
The experience of longing for love is universal and deeply rooted in our humanity. This longing, often described as an unquenchable thirst, is both a blessing and a burden, driving us to form connections, seek fulfillment, and explore the depths of our own emotions.
Delving into the realm of quantum physics, there’s an intriguing principle known as quantum entanglement. It suggests that two particles, once entwined, will remain connected irrespective of distance. A change in the state of one will instantly affect the state of the other, no matter how far apart they are.
Drawing a parallel to human emotions, particularly longing, one could argue that individuals form ’emotional entanglements.’ The sense of connection might not be physical but is as intense, enduring, and mystifying as quantum entanglements. This could be the reason why, even in separation, our emotions remain tethered to another person, place, or memory. Longing is a complex emotion that can arise from various sources. At its core, it’s a yearning for something that seems to be just out of reach. We might long for a loved one, for a sense of belonging, for an idealized version of the world, or for a deeper connection with ourselves.
Our longing for love can be seen as a biological imperative. Our ancestors who formed strong social bonds and felt a deep connection to their kin were more likely to survive and reproduce. As a result, the longing for love and connection is deeply ingrained in our genetic makeup. Our experiences shape our emotional responses. For instance, early attachment experiences with caregivers can influence our future relationships and how we perceive love. Similarly, our psychological makeup, shaped by both nature and nurture, affects how we experience longing.
The relationship between love and longing is paradoxical. On the one hand, love can make us feel whole, bringing joy and fulfillment. On the other hand, it can also create a sense of longing, especially when faced with separation or unfulfilled desires. This tension is often evident in poetry and art, where love and longing are intertwined in complex ways. When we are in love, we often feel a sense of completeness. The world seems brighter, and we may experience a deep sense of contentment. This feeling arises from the connection and emotional intimacy that love brings. In these moments, longing may fade into the background. Despite the fulfillment that love offers, it can also create a sense of longing. When separated from a loved one, the intensity of our love can manifest as a deep yearning for their presence. This longing can also arise from unmet emotional needs, unfulfilled desires, or the idealization of love.
Love and longing are not mutually exclusive; they often coexist. The very act of loving someone can make us more aware of their absence when they are not around. Similarly, longing can intensify our love, making us cherish our moments of connection even more. This dynamic interplay adds depth to our emotional experiences.
Longing is not a singular emotion; it encompasses a range of feelings, including hope, desire, melancholy, and even pain. Longing often involves a strong desire for something or someone. This desire can create a sense of anticipation, making us look forward to future possibilities. The act of longing can be both exciting and agonizing, as we await the fulfillment of our desires. Longing can also be rooted in the past. We may long for a time when we felt loved, accepted, or understood. This sense of nostalgia can be accompanied by melancholy, as we realize that the past cannot be recaptured. Sometimes, longing arises from idealization. We may create a mental image of the perfect partner, the ideal life, or a utopian world. These idealized visions can make us feel discontented with our current reality, fueling a sense of longing. Longing can be painful, especially when it feels unending or unrequited. The intensity of our yearning can create a sense of suffering, as we grapple with the gap between our desires and reality.
Wrestling with the feelings associated with longing can lead to deeper emotional intelligence. Through introspection, we can learn more about ourselves, our needs, and our desires. Understanding the root of our longing can help us address underlying issues or unmet needs in our lives. everyone has felt it at some point. Recognizing this shared experience can foster empathy towards others and deepen our human connections. By understanding our own feelings of longing, we become better equipped to empathize with others.
Life is characterized by dualities: happiness and sorrow, presence and absence, fulfillment and yearning. While these might seem contradictory, they often exist side by side and give depth to our experiences.
Presence in Absence: Even in the absence of what we long for, there’s a certain presence of that object or person in our thoughts and emotions. This phenomenon speaks to the power of our minds and hearts to transcend physical limitations.
Completeness in Incompleteness: The very feeling of longing suggests that there’s something we deem essential for our completeness. However, the journey of life is about realizing that, in many ways, we are already complete in our incompleteness. The gaps and spaces create room for growth, evolution, and understanding.
Stability in Flux: Our feelings, including longing, are in constant flux. They come and go, intensify and wane. But beneath these changing emotions, there’s a stable core of self, a foundational aspect of our being that remains unswayed.
Is harmony defined by us is really harmonious ?
The universe operates on a balance. Dualities like light and dark, joy and sorrow, and so on, are not in contention with each other but rather two sides of the same coin. They provide context and meaning. It’s akin to understanding that one cannot truly appreciate light without having known darkness. Our existence is enigmatic, where a myriad of elements interplay in a vast cosmic dance. Every action, no matter how minute, sends ripples across the fabric of the universe. Such is the interconnectedness and oneness that defines the cosmos. But amidst this vastness, we humans grapple with the age-old questions: Why are we here? Why do we feel disconnected when everything is intrinsically connected? And, why is our life, despite being a part of this vast universe, so often defined by duality?
Consider the universe as an immense symphony, where every entity is like a note, contributing to an eternal, harmonious melody. From the most massive stars to the tiniest organisms, everything is in sync, vibrating in tune with the universe. This sense of harmony is a constant, even if it’s not always immediately apparent. However, the human experience often feels at odds with this cosmic harmony. We frequently perceive life through the lens of duality: good vs. evil, happiness vs. sorrow, success vs. failure. Such bifurcations arise primarily from our mental frameworks, shaped by societal norms, personal experiences, and evolutionary predispositions.
In our evolutionary journey, the human brain developed cognitive systems to categorize, discriminate, and simplify the complex stimuli of the external world, making it digestible and navigable. This cognitive system is a survival tool, enabling us to swiftly identify threats from non-threats, edible food from inedible, and so on. Over time, as societies became more sophisticated, these dualistic mental models began to govern not just our interactions with the environment but also our self-perception, aspirations, and relationships. This dualistic approach further feeds into the illusion of separateness — a feeling that we are distinct from the rest of the universe. Despite being made of stardust and sharing common atomic ancestors with everything around us, we often feel isolated or alienated. Such feelings intensify when we face adversities, leading many to question the harmony and purpose of existence.
Our understanding of freedom is entwined with our perception of duality. True freedom is not just liberation from external constraints but also from internal ones, like prejudices, fears, and limiting beliefs. To break free from the life’s cycle, one needs to reconcile with dualities, recognizing them as constructs rather than inherent truths. As we delve deeper into the framework of existence, we find that duality isn’t inherently detrimental. Instead, it provides contrast, lending depth and dimension to our experiences. Just as the contrasting strokes of a painting give it life and depth, the dualities of our lives add vibrancy and richness to our existence. Without dark, there would be no understanding of light; without sorrow, the true essence of joy would remain unknown.
Much of our attachment to duality stems from societal and cultural conditioning. From childhood, we’re taught to label and categorize experiences: winning is good, losing is bad; happiness is desirable, sadness is not. Over time, these labels solidify into beliefs, shaping our perceptions and reactions. For instance, consider the universally accepted notion of success. Societal metrics of success often revolve around material wealth, social status, and professional achievements. However, if we were to strip away these conditioned beliefs and look at life through an unfiltered lens, we might find that true success lies in inner contentment, meaningful relationships, and personal growth.
Our fixation on the ephemeral aspects of life — fleeting emotions, transient experiences, and temporal possessions — further entrenches us in the duality trap. In the rush of life, we often overlook the eternal — the unchanging, omnipresent essence that underlies all existence. This essence, often referred to in spiritual contexts as the ‘Self’ or ‘Consciousness,’ remains unaffected by the dualities that play out on the surface.
By connecting with this eternal aspect of ourselves, we begin to view dualities with a sense of detachment. They appear as passing clouds against the vast sky of our existence, impactful in the moment but not defining our eternal essence. Aligning with the duality doesn’t mean becoming passive or indifferent. It means engaging with life wholeheartedly, experiencing every emotion, every high and low, but without letting them dictate our inner state. With heightened awareness, we can navigate the complexities of life with grace, recognizing the transient nature of our experiences.
This awareness doesn’t diminish our experiences but rather enriches them. When we embrace both the joys and sorrows of life with equanimity, we live more fully, more authentically. We begin to see challenges as opportunities for growth, failures as lessons, and successes as moments of gratitude.
Our perception of disharmony is influenced by our thoughts, emotions, and our attachments to outcomes. When we find ourselves in situations we didn’t desire or anticipate, our immediate response is resistance. This resistance, this non-acceptance, creates friction – a perceived disharmony.
The journey to non-duality is a continuous process of introspection, reflection, and growth. Various spiritual traditions offer paths to transcend duality: the Yogic tradition advocates for meditation and self-inquiry, Buddhism emphasizes mindfulness and compassion, while Taoism teaches the art of flowing with life, embracing both its yin and yang.
The common thread across these traditions is the idea of returning to one’s true nature — a state of pure consciousness, free from the constraints of duality.
Divinity – an escape to fear ?
As we delve into the concept of divinity, we encounter a landscape of varying interpretations and perceptions, shaped by the human quest for understanding and meaning. Divinity refers to the state of things that are believed to come from a supernatural power or deity, such as a god, or spirit beings, and are therefore regarded as sacred and holy. Such things are regarded as divine due to their transcendental origins or because their attributes or qualities are superior or supreme relative to things of the earthly world.
But why, one might ask, is divinity interpreted differently by different individuals and cultures? And how can something considered divine and universal also be understood subjectively?
While it may seem paradoxical, the reason lies in the intersection of the human cognitive apparatus with the profound mystery that the concept of divinity embodies. Even though divinity may represent universal principles or realities, the ways in which we understand, relate to, and express these principles are inherently influenced by our cultural, psychological, and experiential contexts.
Cultural factors play a significant role in shaping our views of the divine. Different religions and spiritual traditions have unique ways of conceptualizing and relating to divinity, reflecting their historical, cultural, and philosophical contexts. For instance, monotheistic religions like Christianity, Islam, and Judaism conceive of divinity as a single, all-powerful God, while polytheistic traditions like Hinduism and ancient Greek religion portray divinity in the form of many gods and goddesses, each representing different aspects of reality.
Psychological factors also contribute to the subjective experience of divinity. Our personal beliefs, emotions, experiences, and cognitive processes shape our understanding and experience of the divine. Some people might experience divinity as a personal relationship with a divine being, while others might perceive it as a transcendent state of consciousness or a profound sense of connection with all of life.
As for why divinity appears to wear ‘multiple masks,’ this is again a reflection of the diversity and complexity of human understanding and experience. Just as a multifaceted diamond reflects light in various ways, the concept of divinity can manifest in countless forms, reflecting the myriad ways in which human beings perceive and relate to the mystery of existence.
One might wonder: if the laws of nature are universal, why is our understanding of divinity so diverse? This discrepancy can be understood by considering the difference between objective and subjective realms of knowledge.
The laws of nature belong to the realm of objective knowledge. They can be studied, tested, and validated using the scientific method, which is designed to minimize the influence of individual bias and subjective perception. This is why scientific knowledge, including our understanding of the laws of nature, is largely consistent across different cultures and societies.
On the other hand, our understanding of divinity belongs primarily to the realm of subjective knowledge. It’s rooted in personal experience, cultural context, and introspective understanding, all of which are inherently subjective. While subjective knowledge can be deeply meaningful and transformative, it is also diverse and multi-dimensional, reflecting the complexity of human perception and experience.
Despite this diversity, there may be universal principles or realities underlying our various perceptions of the divine. These might include principles like the interconnectedness of all life, the transformative power of love and compassion, or the existence of a reality that transcends our ordinary perception.
However, just as a map is not the territory it represents, our concepts and images of the divine are not the divine itself. They are human-made representations, shaped by our cognitive capacities and cultural contexts. The divine itself, whatever it may be, likely transcends our human capacities for understanding and conceptualization.
To further elaborate, let’s consider an analogy. Picture a group of people standing around a magnificent sculpture placed in the center of a room, each person looking at the sculpture from a different angle. While they’re all observing the same object, the perspective they have of the sculpture is unique to their standpoint. Some will notice features that are invisible to others, while some aspects remain hidden to everyone. In essence, they are all viewing the same objective reality, yet their individual subjective experiences differ.
This analogy provides some insight into how people perceive divinity. Even though there may exist an objective divine reality (the sculpture), the way people perceive and experience it (their view of the sculpture) is dependent on their individual perspectives. These perspectives are shaped by a variety of factors including personal experiences, cultural backgrounds, religious beliefs, and individual psychological make-up.
In other words, the “masks” of divinity that different cultures, religions, and individuals see are representations tailored to their unique viewpoints and contexts. This diversity in divine interpretation does not necessarily imply that divinity itself is subjective or inconsistent, but rather that our understanding and experiences of it are.
Moving forward, it’s important to differentiate between the objectivity of the laws of nature and the subjectivity of our experience and understanding of divinity. The laws of nature operate independently of human perception or consciousness; they govern the physical world whether or not anyone is aware of them. Scientists strive to discover and understand these laws through a methodical, systematic process that aims to be as objective and unbiased as possible.
In contrast, our relationship with divinity is deeply personal and subjective. It depends largely on individual consciousness, belief systems, and experiences. Unlike the laws of nature, our experiences of the divine cannot be measured or empirically verified. They lie beyond the domain of scientific investigation and are instead in the realm of personal and spiritual exploration.
This doesn’t mean that our experiences of the divine are less “real” or valuable than scientific knowledge, just that they operate within a different sphere of human experience and understanding. Both realms – the objective and the subjective, the scientific and the spiritual – are crucial aspects of our quest for knowledge and meaning.
Many of the world’s religious and spiritual traditions point towards the possibility of experiencing divinity directly, beyond conceptual understanding. This direct experience, sometimes described as “mystical” or “transcendent,” is often said to transcend ordinary categories of thought and perception, providing a profound sense of unity, sacredness, or ultimate reality.
However, the path to such experiences is highly individual and cannot be standardized or prescribed. It often involves practices like meditation, contemplation, devotion, ethical living, or service to others, aimed at cultivating qualities like mindfulness, compassion, humility, and openness to the divine.
Ultimately, our understanding and experience of divinity are part of the rich tapestry of human existence, reflecting our deepest yearnings, questions, and potentials. They invite us to explore the mysteries of life, to cultivate virtues and wisdom, and to connect with something greater than ourselves. Despite the diversity of divine interpretations, they all point towards a reality that transcends the limitations of our ordinary perception, inviting us on a journey of discovery, transformation, and awakening.
Paradox of Effort and Effortlessness
In the vast expanse of the universe, there is an inherent rhythm, a flow that moves with an effortless ease. The planets orbit around the sun, the tides ebb and flow, the seasons change, all in an effortless dance of existence. This is the law of nature, the law of the universe – a state of effortless being. Yet, as human beings, we often find ourselves in a state of constant effort, pushing against the currents of life, striving to achieve, to become, to attain. This dichotomy raises a profound question – why is there effort involved in all we do when effortless is the law of nature and the universe?
To understand this paradox, we must delve into the nature of the human mind and the construct of the ‘self’. The ‘self’, or the ‘I’, is a construct of the mind, a collection of thoughts, beliefs, and experiences that we identify with. It is this ‘self’ that strives, that makes effort, that pushes against the flow of life. The ‘self’ seeks to preserve and enhance itself, to achieve and attain, to become more than what it is. This striving, this effort, is born out of a sense of incompleteness, a feeling of lack, a desire for more.
However, this constant effort, this push, is indeed in conflict with the law of the universe. It creates a sense of struggle, a feeling of being out of sync with the natural flow of life. It is like trying to swim against the current – it requires effort, struggle, and ultimately leads to exhaustion.
So, how can we align ourselves with the law of the universe, with the effortless flow of life? The key lies in understanding the nature of the ‘self’ and the illusion of effort.
The ‘self’ is not a fixed or permanent entity. It is a transient construct, a collection of thoughts, beliefs, and experiences that are constantly changing and evolving. The effort we make, the push we exert, is an attempt to hold onto this transient ‘self’, to make it permanent, to give it substance. But this is an illusion. The ‘self’ is like a river, constantly flowing, constantly changing. Trying to hold onto it is like trying to hold onto water – it slips through our fingers, leaving us empty-handed.
When we realize this, when we see the transient nature of the ‘self’, the illusion of effort begins to dissolve. We see that there is nothing to hold onto, nothing to strive for, nothing to become. We see that we are already part of the effortless flow of life, that we are already in sync with the law of the universe. We see that effort is not necessary, that it is a product of our misunderstanding, our misperception.
This realization brings a profound shift in our approach to life. Instead of striving, we start being. Instead of pushing, we start flowing. Instead of making effort, we start living effortlessly. We align ourselves with the law of the universe, with the effortless flow of life. We become like the planets orbiting around the sun, the tides ebbing and flowing, the seasons changing – moving with an effortless ease, in harmony with the universe.
The paradox of effort and effortlessness is a reflection of our misunderstanding of the ‘self’ and the law of the universe. When we understand the transient nature of the ‘self’ and the effortless flow of the universe, we can let go of effort and align ourselves with the natural rhythms of life. This is not a state of passivity or inaction, but a state of active surrender, of conscious participation in the dance of existence. It is a state of being inflow, of moving with the currents of life, of living in harmony with the universe.
Effort arises from the illusion of separateness, from the belief in a separate ‘self’ that needs to strive, to achieve, to become. It is a product of the mind, a manifestation of the ego. The ego seeks to preserve and enhance itself, to assert its existence, to prove its worth. It believes that it needs to make effort, to push, to strive, in order to survive and succeed.
But this is a misunderstanding. The ‘self’, the ego, is not a separate entity, but a part of the whole, a wave in the ocean of existence. It does not need to strive or struggle, for it is already part of the effortless flow of life. It is already in harmony with the law of the universe.
When we realize this, when we see the illusion of the separate ‘self’ and the futility of effort, we can let go. We can surrender to the flow of life, to the effortless ease of existence. We can stop pushing, stop striving, stop struggling. We can simply be, simply flow, simply exist.
This does not mean that we become passive or inactive. On the contrary, we become more active, more engaged, more alive. But our action is not born out of effort or struggle, but out of alignment with the flow of life. It is not a push, but a flow. It is not a fight, but a dance.
We move with the currents of life, not against them. We dance with the rhythms of existence, not against them. We flow with the river of life, not against it. We become one with the universe, in harmony with its laws, in sync with its rhythms.
This is the state of effortless living, of being in flow, of being in harmony with the universe. It is a state of grace, of peace, of joy. It is our natural state, our true nature, our birthright.
So, let us let go of effort, let go of struggle, let go of the illusion of the separate ‘self’. Let us align ourselves with the flow of life, with the law of the universe. Let us live effortlessly, flowingly, joyously. Let us dance with the rhythms of existence, with the music of the universe. Let us be in harmony with all that is, with all that we are.
In the end, it is not about putting away fear or effort, but about understanding their nature and their roots. It is about seeing the illusion of the separate ‘self’ and the futility of effort. It is about aligning ourselves with the flow of life, with the law of the universe. It is about living effortlessly, flowingly, joyously. It is about being in harmony with all that is, with all that we are. It is about being, simply being, in the here and now, in the eternal present, in the heart of existence.
Paradox of Effort and Effortlessness
In the vast expanse of the universe, there is an inherent rhythm, a flow that moves with an effortless ease. The planets orbit around the sun, the tides ebb and flow, the seasons change, all in an effortless dance of existence. This is the law of nature, the law of the universe – a state of effortless being. Yet, as human beings, we often find ourselves in a state of constant effort, pushing against the currents of life, striving to achieve, to become, to attain. This dichotomy raises a profound question – why is there effort involved in all we do when effortless is the law of nature and the universe?
To understand this paradox, we must delve into the nature of the human mind and the construct of the ‘self’. The ‘self’, or the ‘I’, is a construct of the mind, a collection of thoughts, beliefs, and experiences that we identify with. It is this ‘self’ that strives, that makes effort, that pushes against the flow of life. The ‘self’ seeks to preserve and enhance itself, to achieve and attain, to become more than what it is. This striving, this effort, is born out of a sense of incompleteness, a feeling of lack, a desire for more.
However, this constant effort, this push, is indeed in conflict with the law of the universe. It creates a sense of struggle, a feeling of being out of sync with the natural flow of life. It is like trying to swim against the current – it requires effort, struggle, and ultimately leads to exhaustion.
So, how can we align ourselves with the law of the universe, with the effortless flow of life? The key lies in understanding the nature of the ‘self’ and the illusion of effort.
The ‘self’ is not a fixed or permanent entity. It is a transient construct, a collection of thoughts, beliefs, and experiences that are constantly changing and evolving. The effort we make, the push we exert, is an attempt to hold onto this transient ‘self’, to make it permanent, to give it substance. But this is an illusion. The ‘self’ is like a river, constantly flowing, constantly changing. Trying to hold onto it is like trying to hold onto water – it slips through our fingers, leaving us empty-handed.
When we realize this, when we see the transient nature of the ‘self’, the illusion of effort begins to dissolve. We see that there is nothing to hold onto, nothing to strive for, nothing to become. We see that we are already part of the effortless flow of life, that we are already in sync with the law of the universe. We see that effort is not necessary, that it is a product of our misunderstanding, our misperception.
This realization brings a profound shift in our approach to life. Instead of striving, we start being. Instead of pushing, we start flowing. Instead of making effort, we start living effortlessly. We align ourselves with the law of the universe, with the effortless flow of life. We become like the planets orbiting around the sun, the tides ebbing and flowing, the seasons changing – moving with an effortless ease, in harmony with the universe.
The paradox of effort and effortlessness is a reflection of our misunderstanding of the ‘self’ and the law of the universe. When we understand the transient nature of the ‘self’ and the effortless flow of the universe, we can let go of effort and align ourselves with the natural rhythms of life. This is not a state of passivity or inaction, but a state of active surrender, of conscious participation in the dance of existence. It is a state of being inflow, of moving with the currents of life, of living in harmony with the universe.
Effort arises from the illusion of separateness, from the belief in a separate ‘self’ that needs to strive, to achieve, to become. It is a product of the mind, a manifestation of the ego. The ego seeks to preserve and enhance itself, to assert its existence, to prove its worth. It believes that it needs to make effort, to push, to strive, in order to survive and succeed.
But this is a misunderstanding. The ‘self’, the ego, is not a separate entity, but a part of the whole, a wave in the ocean of existence. It does not need to strive or struggle, for it is already part of the effortless flow of life. It is already in harmony with the law of the universe.
When we realize this, when we see the illusion of the separate ‘self’ and the futility of effort, we can let go. We can surrender to the flow of life, to the effortless ease of existence. We can stop pushing, stop striving, stop struggling. We can simply be, simply flow, simply exist.
This does not mean that we become passive or inactive. On the contrary, we become more active, more engaged, more alive. But our action is not born out of effort or struggle, but out of alignment with the flow of life. It is not a push, but a flow. It is not a fight, but a dance.
We move with the currents of life, not against them. We dance with the rhythms of existence, not against them. We flow with the river of life, not against it. We become one with the universe, in harmony with its laws, in sync with its rhythms.
This is the state of effortless living, of being in flow, of being in harmony with the universe. It is a state of grace, of peace, of joy. It is our natural state, our true nature, our birthright.
So, let us let go of effort, let go of struggle, let go of the illusion of the separate ‘self’. Let us align ourselves with the flow of life, with the law of the universe. Let us live effortlessly, flowingly, joyously. Let us dance with the rhythms of existence, with the music of the universe. Let us be in harmony with all that is, with all that we are.
In the end, it is not about putting away fear or effort, but about understanding their nature and their roots. It is about seeing the illusion of the separate ‘self’ and the futility of effort. It is about aligning ourselves with the flow of life, with the law of the universe. It is about living effortlessly, flowingly, joyously. It is about being in harmony with all that is, with all that we are. It is about being, simply being, in the here and now, in the eternal present, in the heart of existence.
Abhishek Fanse 